[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#99621: marked as done (Task-tex shouldn't depend on anything that forces you to install a full GUI system)



Your message dated Sat, 2 Jun 2001 17:27:49 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <Pine.NEB.4.33.0106021726220.6290-100000@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
and subject line Bug#99621: Task-tex shouldn't depend on anything that forces  you to install a full GUI system
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2001 19:07:34 +0000
>From theanaloguekid@tak.dhis.org Fri Jun 01 14:07:34 2001
Return-path: <theanaloguekid@tak.dhis.org>
Received: from bhd5-arc1-s171.mtl.colba.net (tak.net.dhis.org) [207.107.234.181] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 155uGj-0002fw-00; Fri, 01 Jun 2001 14:07:34 -0500
Received: from theanaloguekid by tak.net.dhis.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 155uGi-0002L0-00; Fri, 01 Jun 2001 15:07:32 -0400
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 15:07:32 -0400
From: "S. Massy" <theanaloguekid@tak.dhis.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Bcc: "S. Massy" <theanaloguekid@tak.dhis.org>
Subject: Task-tex shouldn't depend on anything that forces you to install a full GUI system
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20010601150732.A8884@takdhis.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.16
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: task-tex
Version: 0.4
Severity: wishlist

In the new task-tex package that has been uploaded yesterday (0.5) a
dependency has been added to texdoctk. Texdoctk in turn depends on a
full GUI envoronment. This is not a good thing for those who cannot,
or do not desire to, install a full set of
x-apps/desktop-components. It would be nice if task-tex was split so
that the cli/console-oriented programs were placed in the main
metapackage and the graphical add-ons were placed into another
metapackage depending on the former one in turn (something like
task-tex-gui).
(NB: I believe that this approach should be considered for other
Debian metapackages as well, thereof making it possible for someone to
install a fully featured environment of a given nature without
necessarily having to install X or a given desktop. Just my two
cents.)
 
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tak.net.dhis.org 2.4.5 #1 Sun May 27 11:39:31 EDT 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages task-tex depends on:
ii  bibindex               2.9-7             Fast lookup in BibTeX bibliography
ii  bibtool                2.44-3            A tool for manipulating BibTeX dat
ii  dvidvi                 1.0-4             Manipulate .dvi files.            
ii  lacheck                1.26-6            A simple syntax checker for LaTeX.
ii  latex2html             2000-beta1-2      LaTeX to HTML translator.         
ii  mpage                  2.5.1pre-6        print multiple pages per sheet on 
ii  pstoedit               3.21-1            PostScript and PDF files to editab
ii  psutils                1.17-12           A collection of PostScript documen
ii  tetex-base             1.0.2+20000804-7  basic teTeX library files         
ii  tetex-bin              1.0.7+20001218-3  teTeX binary files                
ii  tetex-doc              1.0.2+20000804-7  teTeX documentation               
ii  tetex-extra            1.0.2+20000804-7  extra teTeX library files         
ii  untex                  9210-9            Remove LaTeX commands from input. 
ii  xfig                   1:3.2.3.d-beta2-3 Facility for Interactive Generatio

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 99621-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2001 15:27:56 +0000
>From bunk@fs.tum.de Sat Jun 02 10:27:56 2001
Return-path: <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Received: from nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.176.79] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 156DJj-0003iW-00; Sat, 02 Jun 2001 10:27:55 -0500
Received: (qmail 14630 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2001 15:27:54 -0000
Received: from mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (HELO mimas) (129.187.176.26)
  by nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP; 2 Jun 2001 15:27:54 -0000
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 17:27:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
X-X-Sender:  <bunk@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
To: "S. Massy" <theanaloguekid@tak.net.dhis.org>
cc:  <99621-done@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#99621: Task-tex shouldn't depend on anything that forces
 you to install a full GUI system
In-Reply-To: <20010602111954.A12626@takdhis.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0106021726220.6290-100000@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 99621-done@bugs.debian.org

On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, S. Massy wrote:

>...
> > I tend to close this bug because this task-package should help a newbie
> > user to get _everything he might need_ when working with (La)TeX
> > installed (and texdoctk is a big help for someone who isn't that much
> > familar with where to find documentation).
> Oh well, I suppose you're right. I removed task-tex myself.
> I just thought it was nice to have a full environment maintained together
> through a metapackage, though I do not want unnecessary packages installed
> on my system.

When you want you can make your own metapackage, have a look at the equivs
package that makes this really easy.

> Regards,
> S. Massy

cu
Adrian

-- 
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
                -- Mahatma Ghandi



Reply to: