Re: xdvi of tetex-bin in potato
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Subject: Re: xdvi of tetex-bin in potato
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:57:19 +0200 (CEST)
> > Well, I noticed just now that xdvi of tetex-bin 1.0.7-2
> > did not use /usr/share/xaw-wrappers/wrapper. Is it okay?
>
> Please try nextaw (>= 0.8-2) and look at bug #66743.
Yes, I noticed this bug report and discussion there after
sending the previous mail. Sorry.
But my main concern is xdvi in potato and not in woody.
In potato nextawg is still of 0.5.1-34 and so xaw-wrappers
is necessary.
From: Denis Barbier <barbier@imacs.polytechnique.fr>
Subject: Re: xdvi of tetex-bin in potato
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 07:48:33 +0200
> I definitely do not understand why xdvik-ja has
> update-alternatives --install /usr/X11R6/bin/xdvi-ja.bin \
> xdvi-ja.bin /usr/X11R6/bin/xdvi-ja.real 25
> instead of
> update-alternatives --install /usr/X11R6/bin/xdvi.bin \
> xdvi.bin /usr/X11R6/bin/xdvi-ja.real 25
My Debian system is basically of potato but only tetex-* are
from woody and I tested the above method. It works perfect
as far as I tested.
But as I said first, in potato there is /usr/share/xaw-wrappers/wrapper
intermediate the links of alternatives (can you understand this
explanation?).
Is the advise of Denis effective even in this situation?
(I think to test it later by myself but if someone knows
the answer, please tell me the answer)
Best Regards, 2000.7.19
--
Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
Reply to: