[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#39464: Missing Manual Pages for Debian



"C.M. Connelly" wrote:
> "CM" == Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de> writes:
>    CM> Did anyone experienced with the respective commands look
>    CM> into these manpages? Is it ok to include them into teTeX?
Well Hans look short into it ;-)

> Hang on a bit longer -- Thomas Esser got back to me with some
> information, and some pointers to ask for more information about
> some of the commands.  I updated the pages I wrote with Thomas'
> information, but I haven't had a chance to look at Tobias Burnus's
> man pages and do a merge (or just replace mine with his -- mine
> are based on the information you get from the `--help' flag).
Whereas mine are based on the information of the PDF manual (URL see
inside,
the manual are available at http://www.pragma-ade.com/)
Note: My manpages are relative to the latest beta and contain a few more
commands (which are neither in the manual nor in the teTeX 1.0x
version).
Contrary to CMC manpages (I couldn't dowload the source since
I got "permission denied") it includes also a longer description of the
commands.
As soon Hans establishes a working CVS tree at
http://context.sourceforge.net/
I'll place them there.
Hans promissed to look at the manpages, but presently ConTeXt seems to
be
more important for him (chinese vertical, absolut positioning, HZ and
other PDFTeX
extras).

> Once I have (soon, I promise), I'll do another release for people
> to look at, and once everyone (especially Thomas) is happy, they
> should be ready to go into teTeX.
Please have a look at the manpages of texexec/texshow/texutil at
http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~tburnus/context-manpages.tar.gz
before you release your next version. (I could also place them at
context.sourceforge.net to make the address look better ;-)

Tobias

PS: Yodl question: I have 
mancommand(.BR )
in the .yo file. This produces with yodl 1.31.18 the output "..BR" which
is wrong,
using (BR) I only get "BR" which is also wrong. Any workaround (but
deleting the "."?)



Reply to: