[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] suites (was Re: re evolution)



cheers,
I got your point now.
Regards,
-Nikolay Kichukov

--- Justin Pryzby <justinpryzby@users.sourceforge.net>
wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 05:04:17PM +0100, Nikolay
> Kichukov wrote:
> > thanks for the explaining.
> > 
> > cite: "bugs in testing happen, but what more can
> you
> > do than make them available in "unstable"
> beforehand?"
> > 
> > So you are saying that there is nothing left to be
> > done than check what bugs are left over in
> unstable
> > before dist-upgrading a testing release?
> Do you mean "to a testing release"?
> 
> If you are trying to run "testing", but are not
> willing to tolerate
> major bugs, well, I'm not sure that is consistent..
> 
> But you could use BTS version tracking to query for
> *known* "rc" bugs
> which apply to the version still in testing, or read
> the changelogs,
> etc.
> 
> > i.e. When I am dist-upgrading testing, i believe
> that slight bugs
> > may be available, but no major ones should be
> there.
> Of course they "shouldn't", but they "shouldn't"
> exit in the first
> place.  If someone had caught the bug before the
> package had moved to
> testing, then there wouldn't be anything much to
> complain about.  But
> well they didn't.
> 
> So install the sid version, which is supposed to be
> fixed, and help
> test it.
> 
> Justin
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> debian-testing-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 



		
___________________________________________________________ 
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com



Reply to: