[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Warning: Int 0x13 function 8 ...



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I'm getting same messages. I'm think that they are not serious, they
started apear from time when I moved my system from crapy WD drive to new
IBM ... my stupid BIOS can't handle drives bigger than 32GB so I had put
there that jumper which limit drive to 32GB size ... at I hope ... I don't
want to see another dead drive same year ;)

Jan Tomasek aka Semik

On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Pontus Edvardsson wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm using Woody, kernel 2.4.17 and lilo 22.1-6. My worries are the
> warnings (se below) I got after installing the new kernel. Prior that,
> I had some, and probably still have, partition table problems caused
> by PQ Magic on one of my disks. (I swap OS disks). My question is;
> does this have to do with the new kernel, lilo or my disks (all of
> them?!). To me it sounds more like a kernel problem, I configured it
> as always, only adding my graphics and soundcard - done that since the
> 2.4.0 was out... Anyone else has these problems?
>
> Another thing, to fix my probably faulty disk, what is the best tool
> for that? I tried debians 'fdisk' and deleted all partitions, wrote
> the config and then created the new ones. It is accessible, but
> PQ-Magic cannot handle the partition (error 108) Not even whipe it
> clean! :(
>
> Warning: Int 0x13 function 8unction 8 and function 0x48 return different
> head/sector geometries for BIOS drive 0x80
> Warning: Int 0x13 function 8 and function 0x48 return different
> head/sector geometries for BIOS drive 0x81
> Warning: Int 0x13 function 8 and function 0x48 return different
> head/sector geometries for BIOS drive 0x82
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pontus


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.10.2 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/

iD8DBQE8MK2T79++DGvj6tMRAo2eAJ9NhEk3soFHqtY5/dQBrKqoOF6LswCfSlZf
8UOMTKHBpt1EdhAYpF2YO14=
=mrki
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: