Re: consensus on stuff left to be fixed in slink
> I have put up a page at
> <URL:http://www.debian.org/~aph/slink-bugs.html>. Included below is
> an ASCII version. Please comment and NMU fixes, even, to stable.
> I will try to keep this page up-to-date.
>
> I shall probably post this to debian-devel over the weekend to try to
> get others to help with the research and NMUs.
>
> --
> .....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
>
>
> Bugs To Try to Fix For Slink
>
> I personally think the following bugs are important enough to be fixed
> in slink. Commentary, dispute, or suggestions should be sent to
> [1]<debian-testing@lists.debian.org>.
> *
...
>
> lsof (no bug)
> For the i386 architecture, at least, the version of lsof shipped
> with slink doesn't match the default kernel, 2.0.36.
> Status: awaiting upload
My fault for not noticing that slink went to 2.0.36 late in the game.
I can do an upload tonight. (Would these uploads ten go to
"proposed-updates"?)
Jim
--
Jim Mintha Email: jim@ic.uva.nl
System Administrator Work: +31 20 525-4919
Informatiseringscentrum Home: +31 20 662-3892
University of Amsterdam Debian GNU/Linux: jmintha@debian.org
_There are always Possibilities_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-testing-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: