Excerpts from Daniel Baumann's message of Mon Okt 11 23:15:06 +0200 2010: > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/01/2010 10:01 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > If the motion is passed, the respective decisions become legally binding > > and e.g. the bylaws can be updated to reflect that. If the motion is not > > passed, everything stays the same as it was as of AGM 2009. > > one member did not approve the motion, therefore the motion is not > passed. second motion on the same topic will be send out end of > week. Did he/she just fail to send the mail or did he actually disapprove? In the first case you could just ping him/her once more. I did not see any disagreement on the list to this motion and I'm therefore quite surprised by this outcome. Could the disapproving member please state his/her reasons for this (if it wasn't pure lazyness). IMO in debian.ch we should be open about this. Do we need a physical AGM in 2010 if the motion does not pass or is it still possible to hold the next AGM early in 2011? Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature