[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Procedures regarding AGM 2010

Excerpts from Daniel Baumann's message of Mon Okt 11 23:15:06 +0200 2010:
> Hash: SHA1
> On 10/01/2010 10:01 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > If the motion is passed, the respective decisions become legally binding
> > and e.g. the bylaws can be updated to reflect that. If the motion is not
> > passed, everything stays the same as it was as of AGM 2009.
> one member did not approve the motion, therefore the motion is not
> passed. second motion on the same topic will be send out end of
> week.

Did he/she just fail to send the mail or did he actually disapprove? In
the first case you could just ping him/her once more. 

I did not see any disagreement on the list to this motion and I'm
therefore quite surprised by this outcome. Could the disapproving
member please state his/her reasons for this (if it wasn't pure lazyness).
IMO in debian.ch we should be open about this.

Do we need a physical AGM in 2010 if the motion does not pass or is it
still possible to hold the next AGM early in 2011?

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter.
Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
~ Samuel Beckett ~

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: