Re: Mailing list move: "Debian UniZH" is no more
Daniel Mettler schrieb am Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 04:23:55PM +0100:
> Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> >No, please no "reply-to:"!
Yes, no reply-to. That's just the wrong way.
> well, but in general, the purpose of having an ml is having a
> public discussion, isn't it?
> if so, posting back to the ml is the much more common usage scenario
> (and thus the expected behaviour) than replying to a subscriber in
Right, but what does this have to do with Reply-To headers?
> further, it avoids getting double messages from ppl
> accidentally hitting "reply-all" instead of "reply".
People should just decide to hit either "list-reply" or "reply" and
then everything works just as it is meant to be.
> i'm not sure whether setting the "reply-to" is the correct
> technical measure though,
> but afaik it's generally accepted
> practice for most mailing lists..
No, it is definitely not accepted. It's widely regarded as broken
"solution" for an already solved problem. See the List-* headers.
/~\ | Axel Beckert
\ / Plain Text Ribbon Campaign | firstname.lastname@example.org (Mail)
X Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News | email@example.com (Mail+Jabber)
/ \ | http://noone.org/abe/ (Web)
To unsubscribe, send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org.