[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [joey@infodrom.org: No SuperH anymore?]

On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 10:12:20PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> could one of you please follow up on the attached mail with a
> public answer to debian-superh@lists.debian.org?

> From: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>
> Subject: No SuperH anymore?
> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 21:20:04 +0200
> To: Debian SuperH Development <debian-superh@lists.debian.org>
> I noticed that this list has been quiet for a while, and I know that
> you were trying to resolve[1] a problem with with different SuperH
> variants and a possible need to support more than only one.
> The number of packages that were compiled and uploaded for this
> architecture has been dropped steadily, due to this and general
> package removal.  However, today I found out[2] that SuperH
> (i.e. binary-sh) has been dropped from the archive.

binary-sh has never been an installable system (libc6 was never uploaded),
and they're currently in the process of switching their architecture
name to "sh3", which means that all the existing .debs were useless.


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

     ``BAM! Science triumphs again!'' 
                    -- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-superh-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: