Am Don, 2002-04-04 um 17.29 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: > > triggered by the entry in DWN about dropping ssh-nonfree I am comming > > back to the issue of the idle-timeout in openssh. This is option is > > the last point why I have to use ssh-nonfree on one box. I sent the > > following message last year but got no answer. > > Hm, I see what you mean. There seems to be a patch at > <http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/jjaakkol/idletimeout.patch> but it > doesn't apply cleanly to current sources. (Jani: do you have an > updated patch available?) > > Do the autolog or timeoutd packages adequately address your needs? Sorry, no. These programs look for idle times in utmp. But I need it for processes started by ssh which do not send any data over stdout for some time. For programms sshd does not create a utmp entry. Christoph
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil