[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please upgrade your machines to sparc64



From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 21:33:34 +0200

> On 06/23/2016 09:31 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> And all of those binaries you say "don't matter" take up memory,
>> swap space, etc.  And if you add this up for the entire system
>> it's non-trivial.
>> 
>> Multiply this by some factor N when virtualization is involved.
> 
> On a machine with 8 TiB of memory? I have also never heard anyone complain
> about memory issues on x86_64. Are you also running i686 for that reasons?

It's physical memory, cache memory, TLB entries.

Not the amount of physical or virtual "address space" the cpu
supports.

> Intel ICC does exactly that. I even provided a reference for that.

I don't understand how such an optimization is even possible, or would
even apply in common cases where the pointer is actually used.


Reply to: