Re: Debian Archive architecture removals
- To: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>
- Cc: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org, admin@debian-ports.org
- Subject: Re: Debian Archive architecture removals
- From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 18:11:29 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87pp6gs4pa.fsf@delenn.ganneff.de>
- Mail-followup-to: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>, Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org, admin@debian-ports.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20150504104741.GA18228@xanadu.blop.info> (Lucas Nussbaum's message of "Mon, 4 May 2015 12:47:41 +0200")
- References: <87zj63oj1r.fsf@gkar.ganneff.de> <[🔎] 20150504062822.GA24735@xanadu.blop.info> <[🔎] 20150504094829.GC15495@mraw.org> <[🔎] CAKTje6FXYe0te=rE-2B0-8OCgdG=tUt_ET66mkHU6rGnJwcnRw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20150504104741.GA18228@xanadu.blop.info>
On 13931 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> That pad says: "As a result of current state, d-ports cannot accept more
> ports". If that's still true, it would make sense to postpone dropping
> hurd and sparc until this is fixed...
Hurd is already on d-p, so hurd actually has double infrastructure use.
And the last "release" they did came from d-p resources, which is
another argument not to continue on ftp-master with them.
Sparc has sparc64 there, so that would be an addition to it.
--
bye, Joerg
Reply to: