Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> (2015-05-04): > I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures > in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and > other teams. I'm not entirely clear on the status of debian-ports.org, > and of what the current downsides of using debian-ports are. Maybe it's > just about supporting and advertising debian-ports as Debian's official > way to host second-class architectures. Maybe there's more to it. What > are the current downsides of moving hurd-i386 and sparc to debian-ports? Last I heard about it, it was understaffed and infra was undersized + needed some changes to make it possible to grow. This was some time ago, so I've added admin@ to make sure we get updated intel on this topic. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature