[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission



Sounds awesome!

I would love to setup a buildd for sparc (32 bit) on this machine for Debian Ports.

I'm a DD and I will send you my SSH public key later. Currently at the airport and on mobile only.

Cheers,
Adrian

> On Oct 12, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Harka Gyozo SA <carlos@ttk.pte.hu> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 08:57:17 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote
>> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 09:43:04AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>>> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz schrieb am Sonntag, dem 04. Oktober 2015:
>>> 
>>>> Where are those machines hosted at the moment and would it be possible
>>>> to keep them at their current place but hand the administration to the
>>>> people working on the sparc/sparc64 ports?
>>>> 
>>>> I would love to set them up as buildds for Debian ports.
>>> 
>>> The machines have broken disks so their raids have failed.  And the
>>> mgmt stuff is complaining about CPU and/or other fans too.
>>> 
>>> I don't think you'd want those machines.
> 
> I have a T2000 as a "hot spare". We can fire it up and give access to it if
> DSA wants, or we can give access to "people working on the sparc/sparc64
> ports" while it's still hosted here.
> AFAIK it has 8GB ram, two working ~73G sff sas hdds, an optical drive, 4xGbit
> eth, and a working management. And it has T1 Naigara cpu (executes the SPARC
> V9 instruction set).
> AFAIK It has a virtualization support ( this works somehow with a solaris
> hypervisor, and works with linux guests, but I think the machine is too small
> to utilize this ).
> We can also add some backup space (on a slow nas with rsync, etc.).
> 
> But as I can see there is sompek and stadler still running...
> 
> It' a little bit noisy, but still works well.
> If I turn it on, I will not hear anything from it because there is an SGI UV
> 1000 in that room :D
> 
> I have a machine like schroeder, but that's still in use (armed to the teeth).
> 
> 
> HARKA Győző
> PTE-TTK SzSzK vez.h.


Reply to: