Re: Bug#731806: debian-installer: FTBFS on sparc: genisoimage errors
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 06:01:00PM +0200, Sébastien Bernard wrote:
> Le 29/04/2014 16:50, Kieron Gillespie a écrit :
> >I'll rebuild one of my SunBlade 2500 latter with sid and see if I
> >get the same result. If it doesn't show the symptom I will rebuild
> >my T2000 and see if it is something specific to the Niagara T1.
> >
> >-Kieron
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Sébastien Bernard
> ><sbernard@nerim.net <mailto:sbernard@nerim.net>> wrote:
> >
> > Le 29/04/2014 16:34, Kieron Gillespie a écrit :
> >
> > I am currently investigating this unusual behavior with
> > strcmp, and I am unable to reproduce the problem using the
> > test_strcmp example provided.
> >
> > It returns the correct output of,
> >
> > result from strcmp('\0000','\0001' is -1)
> >
> > This was built on Debian Wheezy with a T2000 SPARC processor
> > using GCC 4.6.3-14 from Debian Wheezy Repo.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Kieron
> >
> > Hum, I tried with a T5220 with debian 7.5 /wheezy.
> > Same result, the strcmp is ok.
> > Could you try with unstable ?
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> >
> Tested on niagara T5220:
> with wheezy 2.13 glibc:
> root@skynet:~# ./test_strcmp
> result from strcmp('\0000','\0001' is -1)
> result from memcmp('\0000','\0001' is -1)
>
> Tested from debootstrap sid on the same niagara :
> root@skynet:/# ./test_strcmp
> result from strcmp('\0000','\0001' is 0)
> result from memcmp('\0000','\0001' is -1)
>
>
> So, glibc-2.18 is broken on sparc.
So does that mean this commit broke it:
commit ad69cc2652c0422ebac3296d914c25e470498ce1
Author: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed Aug 24 01:32:24 2011 -0700
Rewritten v9/64-bit sparc strcmp.
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 4fde8c2..ab754e5 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2011-08-24 David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
+
+ * sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/strcmp.S: Rewrite.
+
2011-08-24 Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com>
* elf/Makefile: Add rules to build and run unload8 test.
...etc...
--
Len Sorensen
Reply to: