Re: Bug#533601: [sparc] tcpd fails reverse name resolution
- To: "Marco d'Itri" <md@Linux.IT>
- Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#533601: [sparc] tcpd fails reverse name resolution
- From: Anatoly Pugachev <mator@team.co.ru>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:30:08 +0400
- Message-id: <20090702123008.GT11140@mator.deis.gldn.net>
- In-reply-to: <20090630163044.GA9243@bongo.bofh.it>
- References: <20090619083317.8463.68045.reportbug@skylla.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> <20090619084413.GA18410@bongo.bofh.it> <20090619090118.GB3939@lemon.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> <20090619093829.GB20650@bongo.bofh.it> <20090627235810.GA28160@bongo.bofh.it> <20090629083110.GA7872@lemon.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> <20090630152804.GA8840@bongo.bofh.it> <20090630154433.GT11140@mator.deis.gldn.net> <20090630163044.GA9243@bongo.bofh.it>
On 30.06.2009 / 18:30:44 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 30, Anatoly Pugachev <mator@team.co.ru> wrote:
>
> > > > Probably it's ultrasparc specific, so I cc to debian sparc
> > > > hoping somebody tell's us "It's working here".
> > > So, does anybody still use sparc systems?
> > yes, but not slapd...
> This is not specific to slapd in any way.
I don't use tcpd, but using linux on E250 sparc for tests/builds.
Can you please provide a test case, so i can run it on this sparc
machine?
Reply to: