Re: Creation of Sparc (32-bit) port.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:39:16AM +0100, Martin wrote:
> As far as I know nothing has happened for precisely the same reason that
> sparc32 had to be dropped - there isn't anyone to work on the kernel.
> Without that then a separate port isn't going to get too far, but if
> there was some one / some people who were willing to work on it, there
> wouldn't need to be a separate port...
Actually, there would be unless you add additional CPU emulation to
Linux. Chris is suggesting the only viable option.
Reply to: