Re: Ultra 5 disk performance [Was: More storage for my Ultra10]
> The system was equipped with its original IDE disk and a newer 200GB
> one (btw: all 200gigs are available with newer 2.6 kernels).
I had gotten an email off-list from someone else who had put a large
disk into his system and had it work. I had thought that the drive size
limitation was a hardware problem (a lack of addressing bits), at least
with x86 PC hardware. Am I wrong, or does it not matter somehow since
this is Sun hardware?
Did you try the larger drive with 2.4?
This may be a moot question, since I don't think that SATA has been
backported to 2.4. Is that correct?
(fwiw, I would like to stick with 2.4 primarily because 2.6 has a bad
bug involving the parallel printer port. I believe that this bug is
The old 9 GB IDE was giving me trouble last week (read errors), so I
swapped a spare 120 GB I had from another project into the U10. I was
getting around 12.5 mb/s with the old disk, now I get about 15 mb/s
with the 120 GB disk (which is a bog-standard,n not-a-speed-demon
disk). It's noticably quicker, but I'm still interesting in size rather
than speed. I won't be able read or write files faster than 100 mbit
ethernet speeds, regardless of what sort of disk(s) are in the server.
Database Development and Administration
"I am always willing to run some hazard of being tedious, in order to be sure that I am perspicuous" Adam Smith
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page