[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sarge: Sparc5 Parallel Port - no such Device



On Thu, 2005-05-19 16:50:30 +0200, MOSCito@gmx.li <MOSCito@gmx.li> wrote:
> ***lsmod***
> Module                  Size  Used by    Not tainted
> lp                      7412   0  (autoclean)
> parport                26396   0  (autoclean) [lp]
> sunlance                9896   1
> crc32                   3248   0  [sunlance]
> sr_mod                 16088   0  (unused)
> cdrom                  28028   0  [sr_mod]
> ext3                   85292   2  (autoclean)
> jbd                    45860   2  (autoclean) [ext3]
> sd_mod                 11868   6  (autoclean)
> esp                    29232   3  (autoclean)
> scsi_mod               61292   3  (autoclean) [sr_mod sd_mod esp]

You're missing parport_sunbpp here.

> lp: driver loaded but no devices found

Correct.

> I have absolutely no more ideas what else to check.
> 
> Maybe you ?????

# modprobe parport_sunbpp

Well, it works like this: There's a generic parport mid-layer to which
physical parport drivers can attach (and register physical ports). These
are parport_pc, parport_sunbpp, parport_atari, parport_amiga, you name
it.

On the other side, where are users of (physical) parports, 'lp' being
the one mostly used. It implements the low-level (handshake) protocol
used by computers to shift data into parport-based printers. (And there
are other useful clients, like ppdev).

So you've got the mid-layer as well as a high-level protocol driver, but
you're missing parport_sunbpp as a physical driver. Once you've loaded
that, your printer should work just fine.

MfG, JBG

-- 
Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481             _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg  _ _ O
 fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!   O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: