Re: New 2.4.27-2 kernel and d-i images available for sparc - testers wanted
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org> you write:
>On Monday 21 February 2005 08:53, Blars Blarson wrote:
>> In article <email@example.com> you write:
>> >On Saturday 19 February 2005 16:56, Blars Blarson wrote:
>> >> The 20050218 sid netinst cd is missing many sparc64 modules,
>> >> including isofs.
>> >Confirmed, traced and corrected. Should be fixed in next daily builds.
>> Still broken in the second 20050220 release. (There seems to be a bug
>> that misdates the release if it takes too long to build. The release
>> that should have been dated 20050219 was dated 20050220, then got
>> overwritting a day later.)
>Another change had to be made yesterday. My first fix turned out to be=20
>broken as well (it was a theoretically 'good' solution, but unfortunately=20
>not supported in the sparc cdrom builds).
>The next daily build really should have the missing modules.
Still broken in 20050223...
Would you mind actually checking a cd image before claiming it's fixed
Blars Blarson firstname.lastname@example.org
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.