Re: FTBFS: fftw3

[Paul Brossier <piem@altern.org>]

On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:31:53AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:57:25 -0400
> Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> > That makes sense then. I'm only suggesting for fftw3 to disable the
> > -mcpu flag because 1) it's correct, and 2) it would get them past the
> > build failure. Fixing the binutils bug is a seperate issue.
> 
> I completely agree.
> 

could someone try to rebuild fftw3 3.0.1-9 on sparc (the one without the
architecture flag) ? i would like to make sure it can be built when
using the problematic binutils before uploading a new version.

so at the end, what should be the right architecture string to use ?

thanks for your help, piem