Re: [HELP] [PORT] sparc vs sparc5 vs ultrasparc?
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <email@example.com> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 01:54:10AM -0500, James A. Morrison wrote:
> > "Marcelo E. Magallon" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > ultrasparc:
> > >
> > > CC = gcc
> > > CXX = g++
> > > CFLAGS = -mv8 -mtune=ultrasparc ... # the rest is the same as sparc
> > These should be fine for Sarge on SPARC. v8 is the default
> > instruction set for Sarge and tuning for ultrasparc isn't such a bad
> > thing.
> Thanks. What does "default instruction set" mean? I *am* providing a
> library compiled with only -O2. What I'm looking for here is to
> provide an optimized library *too*. From my understanding this can
> make a significant difference on Sparc. Should I use -mv9 for that?
-mcpu=ultrasparc would be good for the optimized libraries.