[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Curernt support for SS1000?



On january, I bought 8 sun1000. He try to install Aurora, 7.3 Suse, 7.1
Suse, a RedHat Linux Sparc 4.1 whithout success. For The distribution Suse,
I try to format the disk, install the kernel, But  at the reboot, the sun
lacked. For Aurora, RedHat, a strange exception arrived.

How can I give my modest contribution to this problem ?

Best Regards
Pascal Viltard


----- Original Message -----
From: "Irvin Probst" <irvin@irvinig.org>
To: "Martin" <inkubus@interalpha.co.uk>
Cc: <davida@pobox.com>; "Debian Sparc" <debian-sparc@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: Curernt support for SS1000?


> On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 01:40, Martin wrote:
> > >   Martin> I was under the impression that sun4d was supported undeer
> > >   Martin> the 2.2 series but had been broken (and not fixed) under
> > >   Martin> 2.4.
> > > i have read that elsewhere too.
> > I belive it was due to a lack of maintainers with adequate hardware.
>
> I remember a post in June in the netbsd-sparc mailing list with a guy
> asking if someone was interested in picking up a SparcCenter 2000 in
> "Tyngsborough, MA (USA)" -don't ask me where it is-. Afaik he got no
> answers so if you need sun4d hardware to start a sun4d port maybe you
> -or anybody willing to start this port- can ask him.
> However these boxes are heavy as hell[1] so I think that only someone in
> the USA can pick it up for a decent price.
>
> The post: http://www.netsys.com/netbsd-port-sparc/2003/06/msg00132.html
>
> [1] I remember that we were 4 people just to lift up a SC2000 rack with
> nothing in it, even the disk arrays are so heavy that one can hardly
> pick up two at a time.
>
> --
> Irvin Probst
> There are 10 types of people in the world... those who understand binary
> and those who don't.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>



Reply to: