Re: [OT] Echelon keywords (was Re: kernel 2.4.18 and 2.4.19 for sparc)
> Yikes. And I thought my SparcStation LX took long with 4 hours.
Oh, so the LX is faster!? Good, I have one laying around here somewhere :)
>Do you really believe the US would spend uncountable millions on a
> surveillance network that could be bogged down with a simple handful of
> keywords?
No I don't. I've been working with computers for the last 22 years (or so),
the last 10 with security on large networks, database design/administration
and numerous other 'advanced' topics. I consider myself _VERY_ good at what
I do.
If I would do something similar (I actually did when I was 14 at the school
network, with the admin's knowledge) I would also make it adaptable.
It's not a matter of 'loading' the servers, it's about making a statement,
and to spread the word! You wouldn't know how much mail I get about this
subject, from people that thought they knew what they're where doing. They
had _NO_ idea!!
--
World Trade Center Iran Cuba Mossad Khaddafi president PLO ammonium
South Africa Treasury cracking Ft. Bragg toluene Delta Force Uzi
[See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: