[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#111581: more information needed on your bug report

On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 03:11:25PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 07:22:14PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> > The kernel does have some support for emulating umul in software; see
> > arch/sparc/kernel/traps.c::do_illegal_instruction.  This code seems to
> > only be enabled for sun4c and sun4, whereas the original poster
> > mentioned he is using sun4m. 
> Thanks, Phil!
> SPARC folks: is there such a thing as a 4m that doesn't implement the
> umul instruction?

Alright. Here's the low down.

- Yes, the Cypress is a whacky weird CPU. It supports sun4m mmu, but
  only v7 instructions (which excludes muldiv).

- No, the kernel does not trap and patchup non-existent muldiv support.
  This is handled in libc.

- Yes, this is a bug in xfree86. The dynamic loader in xfree86 tries to
  detect this. It used to work, but no longer does because glibc
  switched the _dl_hwcap symbol to be private (which means nothing
  outside of libc can access it).

So, the xfree86 code would fall through on failing to read _dl_hwcap,
and try to best guess the muldiv support via /proc/cpuinfo. It assumed
that sun4m meant "yes, we have hw muldiv", which of course is wrong for

DaveM provided a quick patch that detects a "Cypress" MMU in
/proc/cpuinfo and does not try to use hw muldiv in that case. I've sent
that patch to Branden.

Debian     - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo       - http://www.deqo.com/

Reply to: