[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: X on Sun Blade 100



>> kbd_init: Assuming USB keyboard.
>> usb-ohci.c: USB OHCI at membase 0x1ff02000000, IRQ 9,7e4
>> usb.c: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
>> hub.c: USB hub found
>> usbkbd.c: :USB HID Boot Protocol keyboard driver
>> hub.c: USB new device connect on bus1/2, assigned device number 2
>> input0: USB HIDBP Keyboard 0430:0005 on usb1:2.0
>> hub.c: USB new device connect on bus1/4, assigned device number 3
>> usb.c: USB device 3 (vend/prod 0x430/0x100) is not claimed by any
>> active driver.
>>
>> 	It seems to see the keyboard, but is unsure of the
>> 	mouse.  Perhaps I need to compile my own kernel?!?
>> 	( currenly I'm using the Debian one ; 2.4.18 )
>
> The USB mouse is loaded as a module. Run modconf.

I ran 'modconf' and loaded in 'usbmouse' and it seemed to
work:

usb.c: registered new driver usb_mouse
input1: USB HIDBP Mouse 0430:0100 on usb1:3.0
usbmouse.c: v1.6:USB HID Boot Protocol mouse driver

I also changed my XF86Config-4, as per Vincent Magnin's
advice:

Section "InputDevice"
        Identifier      "Generic Keyboard"
        Driver          "keyboard"
        Option          "CoreKeyboard"
        Option          "XkbRules"      "xfree86"
        Option          "XkbModel"      "pc105"
        Option          "XkbLayout"     "us"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
        Identifier      "Configured Mouse"
        Driver          "mouse"
        Option          "CorePointer"
        Option          "Device"                "/dev/mouse"
        Option          "Protocol"              "PS/2"
EndSection

I'll have to test it when I get home, as I'm at work right
now, but I'll post the results later.  Thanks for the help.

-- 
-------------------------
Loren Bandiera, CISSP
420 Consulting Inc.
lorenb@420consulting.com
-------------------------



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: