Re: 2.2.20 -> 2.4.18 sun4m through apt

To: 'Debian Sparc' <debian-sparc@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: 2.2.20 -> 2.4.18 sun4m through apt
From: Mark Eichin <eichin@thok.org>
Date: 16 May 2002 11:33:17 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] xe11ycckszm.fsf@swat.thok.org>
In-reply-to: Ben Collins's message of "Tue, 14 May 2002 16:14:10 -0400"
References: <[🔎] 000201c1fb0a$97ca5930$0301a8c0@D90V2D0J> <[🔎] IBEALMOLEDIGBEMJPPDAIEHMCDAA.submissions@solarisexpert.com> <[🔎] 20020514201410.GA494@blimpo.internal.net>

don't you want to go to 2.4.17 anyway, rather than .18, because .18
shipped with the "static-linked executables don't work on non-x86"
bug?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- RE: Fresh install of woody on quad SS20?
  - From: Christian Jönsson <christian@j-son.org>
- 2.2.20 -> 2.4.18 sun4m through apt
  - From: "Solarisexpert.com" <submissions@solarisexpert.com>
- Re: 2.2.20 -> 2.4.18 sun4m through apt
  - From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: SILO wasn't able to install
Next by Date: Re: SILO wasn't able to install
Previous by thread: Re: 2.2.20 -> 2.4.18 sun4m through apt
Next by thread: RE: 2.2.20 -> 2.4.18 sun4m through apt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread