Re: SILO on ss20
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
No fuss, I was just wanting to make it fit correctly in Debian, I wasn't
sure if doing this would break silo upgrades and such.
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Ian Tester wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Matthew Twomey wrote:
>
> > I don't know how silo acts if the default conf file is a symlink. Does it
> > point the the actual file or the link itself? Has anyone tried this?
>
> Yes. I did it.... about a year ago? Never had a problem.
>
> > Also does changing /etc/silo.conf to a symlink break anything in Debian
> > (like consistency checks, package verification, ..etc)?
>
> If it does, I've never seen or noticed it.
>
> What's all the fuss about? It's just a symlink!
>
> bye
>
> --
> 8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------
> Ian Tester *8)# \7\ LINUX: because geeks will find a way
> imroy@zipworld.com.au \7\ http://www.zipworld.com.au/~imroy
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
> ------------ Output from gpg ------------
> gpg: Signature made Wed Apr 10 10:38:05 2002 CDT using DSA key ID 41CD061E
> gpg: Good signature from "Ian Tester <imroy@zipworld.com.au>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
> gpg: Fingerprint: EA85 561A 677D 72AC 14C9 F413 A2D6 AFBA 41CD 061E
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQE8tldIWMfBXOjbFQcRAjd+AJ9NgukchKzhLUWfjsyqIsHuZqCh0wCg5LVb
0scc23Fsa7Sz0QoMT5guaPE=
=FfRC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: