Re: Libc6 2.1.3-18 broken ?
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 04:12:16PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
>
> Uh ? Setresuid has been here for ages...
Check the /usr/include/bits/syscall.h, it's not there.
> Plus, glibc contains the prototype for setresuid, it's just a missing
> symbol in the library...
The prototype is always there, the syscall is not always there. Check
/usr/include/linux/ and /usr/include/asm-sparc/, it's not defined
there, so glibc doesn't define it.
> > > I'm currently rebuilding libc6 to see if it's yet an other compilation
> > > "chroot" issue.
> >
> > '"chroot" issue'? The buildd does not suffer from a chroot issue, that
> > was a security team issue. 2.1.3-18 was compiled by me on a machine
> > running stable.
>
> I was not sure about that... There are so many broken packages in
> debian-sparc (gnupg uninstallable, wdm uninstallable) that I thought
> it might have been another compilation-on-unstable uploaded to stable
> or the like...
>
> How do I deal with a package that requires setresuid ?
Which package?
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: