[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Newbie questions



About the wrong bogoMIPS calculation I've noticed that its a 2.4.0 kernel
issue. Maybe we should report the guys, if I did't anything lame. =^)

About the power, is there a way to obtain human readable output from
openprom environment info ?

[]'s
Pablo


On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Pablo Borges wrote:

> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I've recently installed potato on a e4500 machine and noticed some strange
> behaviour.
> 
> First, the bogoMIPS calculation is quite strange: 
> Jan 26 17:00:21 levaca kernel: Calibrating delay loop... 799.53 BogoMIPS
> Jan 26 17:00:21 levaca last message repeated 7 times
> Jan 26 17:00:21 levaca kernel: Total of 9 processors activated (71.96 BogoMIPS)
> 
> Second, the machine hangs or boots when used heavily by period of aprox.
> 3hs. I'm crunching distributed.net rc5 keys, a task that uses full
> processing power, when these things happen.
> 
> and finaly, is there a way to obtain cpu temperature ? may I use SunOS's
> prtdiag for it ?
> 
> []'s
> Pablo
> 
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Pablo Borges                                pablo.borges@uol.com.br
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>   ____                                               Tecnologia UOL
>  /    \    Debian:
>  \__/ |      The 100% suck free linux distro.
>      /
>    /       SETI is lame. http://www.distributed.net  
> 
> 
> 
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Pablo Borges                                pablo.borges@uol.com.br
-------------------------------------------------------------------
  ____                                               Tecnologia UOL
 /    \    Debian:
 \__/ |      The 100% suck free linux distro.
     /
   /       SETI is lame. http://www.distributed.net  





Reply to: