Re: DM9102A & Netra X1 (Was Re: Netra X1 boot getting closer)

[Adam McKenna <adam@debian.org>]

On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 08:30:56PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Yeah, I suspect that is from getaddrinfo() call. The netbios is
> impossible, since I have nothing that should be using that. Perhaps
> something else on the lan.

Nope.  There are no local windows boxes on this lan and those IP addresses
are not local.

> > A few things to try. How about sending larger ping packets 
> > 
> > ping -s 1000

# ping -s 1000 64.21.79.61
PING 64.21.79.61 (64.21.79.61): 1000 data bytes
1008 bytes from 64.21.79.61: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=3.2 ms
1008 bytes from 64.21.79.61: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.5 ms
1008 bytes from 64.21.79.61: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.5 ms
1008 bytes from 64.21.79.61: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=0.5 ms
1008 bytes from 64.21.79.61: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=0.5 ms

--- 64.21.79.61 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.5/1.0/3.2 ms

> > Was this on 100 base-T or 10 base-T connections? Full or half
> > duplex. I have only got a 10 base-T connection at the moment maybe
> > that has something to do with it.
> 
> Did check. I'm check that later aswell.

It autonegotiates 100Mbps FDX under solaris.  The Linux driver doesn't report
the speed -- is there any way to obtain this information from ifconfig?

I can have the network engineer force the port to 100FDX, so we can be sure
that's what it's at if there is no other way to tell.

--Adam

-- 
Adam McKenna  <adam@debian.org>  <adam@flounder.net>