Re: Solaris Binaries
Well I also upgraded to 2.4 and found the emulation no longer worked, not
having any time to work it out I went back to a 2.2.x kernel and it
If your determined to have a 2.4 kernel (or just wish to help) perhaps
you could submit a bug
report on the kernel mailing list.
On Tue, 1 May 2001 email@example.com wrote:
> I have a Sun Ultra 10 running Debian-Sparc unstable tree, upgraded to kernel 2.4.3. Everything is working fine except for SunOS/Solaris binary compatibility. I have the kernel compiled with
> And I have followed the howto, and placed a complete library/include set in /usr/gnemul/solaris, as well as a whole /etc dir:
> total 4
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 26 05:19 solaris
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Apr 26 05:42 sunos -> /usr/gnemul/solaris
> However, whenever I try to run a solaris binary, /any/ one, I get this (that is a tar binary from a Solaris 2.6 box) :
> mculbert@wintermute:~$ ./tar
> bash: ./tar: No such file or directory
> Doesn't seem to matter what the binary is, commandline, gui, anything, it just says ./<binary> No such file or directory.
> I have tried stracing all of them to see if I can see what it is missing, as I would assume it is not finding /something/ but I get only this from it:
> mculbert@wintermute:~$ strace ./tar
> execve("./tar", ["./tar"], [/* 28 vars */]) = 0
> strace: exec: No such file or directory
> I suspect this is quite relevant, but it doesn't help me much, being the first time I've tried cross-binary compatibility. Can someone clue me in to what I am missing? Thanks in advance.
> Mike Culbertson
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com