Re: Potato readiness ?
>>>>> "RM" == Ragga Muffin <ragga@pyxis23.ec.t.kanazawa-u.ac.jp> writes:
RM> The upstream mule2 doesn't support sparc-linux so no luck there
RM> either. (mule is an important package here, so I need to get it
RM> working...)
Why not use MULE 4 (Emacs 20.5)? I did development work for it on
SPARC Potato.
I also built Mule 2.3 on it without much trouble a while ago for
research purposes using the patch to 19.34 from ETL, but the current
Emacs should be much better overall.
Reply to: