Re: glibc 2.2 and gcc (Was Re: something completely different)
In article >Pine.LNX.3.96.1000803173559.17870Aemail@example.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>On 3 Aug 2000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>> Can't you simply add a dummy package called lib6.1 that Depends: or
>> probably even Predepends: on libc6.
>Well, you can change the package name, but you must not change the soname
>or you are going to break binary comaptiblity with every other alpha dist
You're right. I must have left on the lenscap of my mind again.
Cistron Certified Internetwork Expert #1. Think free speech; drink free beer.