Re: Potato Upgrade.
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 12:04:09AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > 2. is the 2.2.7 kernel stable enough for production use.
>
> If you are running a 2.0.x kernel on a sparc, you don't really know the
> meaning of stable until you upgrade to a 2.2.x (2.2.15 recommended)
> kernel. Believe me, the speed and stability improvements are well worth
> it. I would do this before upgrading to potato completely:
>
> apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.15-sun4cdm
> (unless you feel more comfortable with compiling your own, then do that)
>
> ...reboot, then:
>
> apt-get dist-upgrade
Ok, sorry for being clueless, but after spending an hour
or more looking at the debian site (I have a *really* slow modem)
I found a bunch of kernel packages whose names are:
stable 100% kernel-headers-2.0.33_2.0.33-10
stable 100% kernel-headers-2.0.34_2.0.34-4
stable 100% kernel-headers-2.0.35_2.0.35-3
stable 100% kernel-patch-2.0.33-m68k_2.0.33-7
stable 99% kernel-doc-2.1.125_2.1.125-1
stable 99% kernel-doc-2.2.1_2.2.1-1
stable 86% kernel-doc-2.0.35_2.0.35-3
stable 86% kernel-doc-2.0.34-2.0.34-4
stable 86% kernel-doc-2.0.33_2.0.33-10
unstable 67% kernel-patch-2.2.12-sparc_2.2.12-1
frozen 67% kernel-patch-2.2.12-sparc_2.2.12-1
unstable 62% kernel-patch-2.2.14-ide_20000113-2
frozen 62% kernel-patch-2.2.15-ide_20000405-1
unstable 62% kernel-patch-2.2.15-ide_20000405-1
frozen 62% kernel-patch-2.2.14-ide_20000113-2
stable 53% kernel-source-2.0.34_2.0.34-4
unstable 49% kernel-headers-2.2.13_2.2.13-2
unstable 49% kernel-headers-2.2.12_2.2.12-4
unstable 49% kernel-headers-2.2.10_2.2.10-1
frozen 49% kernel-headers-2.2.15_2.2.15pre20-1
None of them say "...sun4cdm". I realize I am looking
for sources and not images.... but... the numbers don't
match either.
I suppose I want kernel-source-2.0.34_2.0.34-4 and
kernel_patch-2.2.12-sparc_2.2.12-1. Do I also need
another patch to bring the level up to 2.2.15 (for
sparc)? If so, where is it?
If I install the above kernel-source and kernel-patch,
does that include/update the appropriate kernel-headers
and/or kernel-doc? I suspect it includes kernel-headers
but not kernel-doc?
What do the percentages mean?
Can I apply kernel-patch-2.2.12-sparc_2.2.12-1 to
kernel-source-2.0.34_2.0.34-4? My guess would have been that
kernel-patch-2.2.12-sparc_2.2.12-1 should be applied
to a 2.2.12 sparc kernel to produce a 2.2.12-1 sparc kernel.
I'm all confused.
--
bjb@achilles.net
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Reply to: