[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Which X server



OK, being a brave (or is that stupid?) soul, I tried to compile it, but it
has me totally stumped.  After doing 'make World' I get this...

**************************************************
cd ./config/imake && make -f Makefile.proto all
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/xfree/xc/config/imake'
gcc -O -ansi -pedantic  -I../../include -I../../exports/include/X11  -I../..
-I../../exports/include  -Dlinux LinuxMachineDefines
-D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500L -D_BSD_SOURCE
-D_SVID_SOURCE   -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO
-DCPP_PROGRAM="\"/lib/cpp\""   -c -o imake.o imake.c
gcc: cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations
**************************************************

I cannot figure out what is wrong here.  Not sure if it is the compiler, the
makefiles or something else.  If there is a simple fix to this, please let
me know and I will try again, otherwise I will just wait.

Cheers
Michael Anthon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Collins [mailto:bcollins@debian.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 May 2000 6:55 PM
> To: Michael Anthon
> Cc: 'debian-sparc@lists.debian.org'
> Subject: Re: Which X server
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:20:25PM +1000, Michael Anthon wrote:
> > That is definitely the one (get a little piccie with an 
> eagle looking thing
> > at bootup).
> > 
> > Thanks for the info, will dload the latest 3.3 and see if I 
> can compile it
> 
> Branden is working on a new upload of X server packages for SPARC that
> incorporates Jakub's latest patches. If you can't get it compiled
> yourself, hang tight till the new packages are installed.
> 
> Ben
> 
> -- 
>  
> -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====---------
> ---=-=------
> /  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  
> Debian GNU/Linux   \
> `  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  
> bcollins@linux.com  '
>  
> `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======---
> ----=--=---'
> 



Reply to: