[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Need help [Fwd: Bug#52468: wml: undefined symbol: PL_sv_undef at /usr/lib/perl5/5.004/sparc-linux/DynaLoader.pm line 169.]



Hello,

I got this bug report, and I'm not quite sure whether this is a Perl
problem, a Sparc problem, a Perl on Sparc problem, an autobuilder
problem, or what.  This works for me on an i386.

Please cc me, as I don't subscribe to either of these lists.

Thanks for your help,

Brian Bassett

aph@debian.org wrote:
> 
> Package: wml
> Version: 1.7.4-2
> Severity: normal
> 
> Example session, from english/logos area of Debian web site CVS area:
> 
> <apharris@arroz:logos> make
> wml -q -o UNDEFuEN:index.en.html   index.wml
> Can't load '/usr/lib/wml/perl/lib/5.005/sparc-linux/auto/IO/IO.so' for module IO: /usr/lib/wml/perl/lib/5.005/sparc-linux/auto/IO/IO.so: undefined symbol: PL_sv_undef at /usr/lib/perl5/5.004/sparc-linux/DynaLoader.pm line 169.
> 
>  at /usr/lib/wml/perl/lib/5.005/sparc-linux/IO/Handle.pm line 241
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/wml/perl/lib/5.005/sparc-linux/IO/Handle.pm line 241.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/wml/perl/lib/5.005/sparc-linux/IO/Seekable.pm line 51.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/wml/perl/lib/5.005/sparc-linux/IO/File.pm line 112.
> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/wml line 55.
> make: *** [index.en.html] Error 2
> 
> -- System Information
> Debian Release: potato
> Kernel Version: Linux arroz 2.2.13 #7 Wed Nov 3 12:56:22 EST 1999 sparc64 unknown
> 
> Versions of the packages wml depends on:
> ii  eperl           2.2.14-0.6     Embedded Perl 5 Language
> ii  iselect         1.2.0-3        An interactive line selection tool for ASCII
> ii  libc6           2.1.2-8        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
> ii  m4              1.4-10         a macro processing language
> ii  perl-5.005      5.005.03-4     Larry Wall's Practical Extracting and Report
> ii  slice           1.3.4-3        Extract out pre-defined slices of an ASCII f


Reply to: