Re: glibc 2.1 in potato
On Mon, Mar 22, 1999 at 09:34:41PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Ok, I've gotten glibc 2.1.1-0.1 compiled. No real problems (atleast no
> C++ libs problems like i386 is having).
>
> Only thing I see wrong is tar broke:
>
> tar: error in loading shared libraries: tar: symbol chown, version
> GLIBC_2.1 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
>
> GLIBC_2.1 is defined (atleast it shows when I grep strings libc.so.6)
> in libc.
>
> The `chown' comand works fine, however, and nothing else seems to be
> affected. Could this be a bad compile of tar or was the previous glibc
> 2.1pre's compiled with some strange symbols?
Just a note, I really need to reboot before I strike these as
persistent problems, but since I wasn't able to restart sshd or reboot
the system before my dial-up droped me, I will have to wait till
tomorrow morning when I go into work.
--
----- -- - -------- --------- ---- ------- ----- - - --- --------
Ben Collins <b.m.collins@larc.nasa.gov> Debian GNU/Linux
OpenLDAP Core - bcollins@openldap.org bcollins@debian.org
UnixGroup Admin - Jordan Systems The Choice of the GNU Generation
------ -- ----- - - ------- ------- -- ---- - -------- - --- ---- - --
Reply to: