Re: 2.1.125 source in slink - why?
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 05:34:15PM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 04:28:54PM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> > > On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> > >
> > > > dists/slink/main/binary-all/kernel-source-2.1.125
> > > >
> > > > why?? and 2.0.33, 2.0.34, 2.0.35
> > > >
> > > > 2.0.36 I can understand :-)
> > >
> > > 2.1.125 - because we needed it for sparc, so we uploaded the source.
> >
> > powerpc, actually. I take full responsibility. It's going to go away
> > shortly, assuming 2.2.0 powerpc packages work OK.
> >
> > Dan
>
> If you're doing the kernel source upload, how would you feel about
> including the sparc patches? You can get them from the davem directory,
> and we need a patched 2.2 in slink for sparc, since it fixes a serious bug
> for cgsixes..
I won't be doing the upload, actually. I believe Johnie Ingram did...
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| CMU, CS class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Part-Time Systems Programmer |
| dan@debian.org | | drow@cs.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
Reply to: