Re: 2.1.125 source in slink - why?
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 04:28:54PM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> >
> > > dists/slink/main/binary-all/kernel-source-2.1.125
> > >
> > > why?? and 2.0.33, 2.0.34, 2.0.35
> > >
> > > 2.0.36 I can understand :-)
> >
> > 2.1.125 - because we needed it for sparc, so we uploaded the source.
>
> powerpc, actually. I take full responsibility. It's going to go away
> shortly, assuming 2.2.0 powerpc packages work OK.
>
> Dan
If you're doing the kernel source upload, how would you feel about
including the sparc patches? You can get them from the davem directory,
and we need a patched 2.2 in slink for sparc, since it fixes a serious bug
for cgsixes..
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
Reply to: