[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Uploaded perl 5.004.04-5 (sparc) to chiark



On Mon, May 18, 1998 at 09:45:23AM +0200, Juan Cespedes wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 1998 at 10:02:04AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 1998 at 11:26:13AM +0200, Juan Cespedes wrote:
> > > Format: 1.5
> > > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 23:00:09 -0800
> > > Source: perl
> > > Binary: perl-suid perl-debug perl-base perl
> > > Architecture: sparc
> > > Version: 5.004.04-5
> > > Distribution: unstable
> >                 ^^^^^^^^
> > This should go into frozen, too, right?
> 
> 	I thought Debian/Sparc wasn't supposed to be released as hamm.

Re-Question: Then why did you upload the other 5 packages for hamm
and slink?  Either everything goes to both or to only slink, but not
this mixture.

> At least, that's what Brian White said, and we're only working with
> unstable (slink) right now.  Should we re-upload all the things that
> go to slink back to hamm?

Look into your .changes files, they state "Distribution: frozen unstable".
Look at my announce, it refers to files uploaded into hamm and they
do exist.

> 	(BTW: I didn't change the "Distribution" or "Urgency" fields;
> they were that way in the souce package).

Possible, nevertheless you should adjust these fields when uploading
non-native-arch packages.

Thanks,

	Joey
-- 
  / Martin Schulze  *  joey@infodrom.north.de  *  26129 Oldenburg  /
 / If you come from outside of Finland, you live in wrong country /
/ Featuring Debian GNU/Linux               motd von irc.funet.fi /

Attachment: pgppb3oDkIqP4.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: