Re: kernel-patch*sparc* and libc-sparc
On Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 01:37:44PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> [ Just looking at some ftp.debian.org problems in relation to Quinn
> Diff, and these are the sparc-related areas ]
> a) Why is kernel-patch*sparc* Architecture: sparc and not
> Architecture: all? You don't need a sparc to install it and cross
> compile a sparc kernel (I assume). m68k's kernel-patch is Arch:
> all, and I use it on an i386 machine to cross compile the m68k
> kernel images.
You are right here. Eric, can you change that?
> b) Is there a binary package produced from the libc-sparc source
> package (in oldlibs)? I can't see one looking at
> hamm/hamm/binary-sparc/Packages. If not, I'll ask Guy to remove
> the source package.
It should be the source for libc5_5.3.12-2_sparc.deb. I don't
know why does it show "libc" as the source package instead of
It's there only because libc5_5.3.12 is the only version or
libc5 ported to Sparc, and we needed the source for all our packages.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org