Re: VERY outdated boot disks
>>>>> "Bdale" == Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com> writes:
Bdale> I have left the 970328 bits in place for the moment, but
Bdale> deleted the even older ALPHA/ tree. If someone other than
Bdale> the person(s) who built the new bits would give them a
Bdale> whirl and report here, I'd like to go delete the 970328
Bdale> bits to save space as soon as I see independent
Bdale> confirmation that the new stuff is functional.
Confirmation forthcoming! The new boot-disks are a *lot* better than
the previous ones. The only niggly doubt in my mind has to do with
{c,s,}fdisk. I'd already partitioned my disks before I tried the new
installation procedure, but the old procedure handle disk partitioning
at all.
--
Stephen
---
"Normality is a statistical illusion." -- me
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: