Re: About XteamLinux (was Re: Unidentified subject!)
如果的确如是，我可不又错怪了好人了？希望是吧。 ^_^
谨向 XteamLinux 和 BluePoint 仝人说声对不起，错怪了您们。 ^_^
这样就太好了，竟然大家都守法了，新闻组里的朋友还骂什么？
（不过，没有他们的骂，可能大家又不会那么快手脚了。）
<--- 东东又开始胡言乱语了！该打！呀呀呀…… <--- 东东疯了。 ^_^
言归正传。既然众公司都守法了，咱们 Debian 中文计划要不要
以「非营利志愿团体第三者」的身份，写份报告贴出来，证明众公司
都守法了，请网友不要左骂右骂前骂后骂，虽然不是骂我们，但我看
这些漫骂实在看得厌了，实在有妨国内国外开放中文软件朋友的士气
。赏罚分明嘛！大家都奉公守法，就该赏了。 ^_^ 有没有人想写份
初稿？ ^_^
东东
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 05:21:25PM +0800, hashao wrote:
> Wednesday, June 28, 2000, 5:02:26 PM, you wrote:
> z>> 大多数朋友所关心源码问题，是指XTeam并没做任何实质工作的大量SRC.RPM没
> z>> 有在网站上发布下载，也没有刻成光盘。坦白说，这原因，一是整个XTeam对
> z>> GPL的这条要求并不了解，二是XTeam的网站到现在还没有更新，正经是没有力
> z>> 量来做，三是XTeam只有在1.0光盘发布的时候没有源码盘，这原因是可以理解
> z>> 的，因为国内光盘发售渠道对于当时的XTeam来说太紧张了，没有能力要求发行
> z>> 渠道为销路不顺的Linux发两张光盘，价钱也会太高。
>
> h> Not because no source code CD. It is okey to not have source code CDs
> h> but they should at least provide source code on request. They did not
> h> do that till now for (L)GPLed softwares.
>
> I think I made a mistake. hmm... Since Xteamlinux did not provide
> download for their binaries(I cannot find download at their site),
> they have no obligation to provide source codes to anyone who did not
> buy binaries from them. They cannot stop others to redistribute
> xteamlinux but they should not responsible for providing source code
> to users who get binaries from redistributors.
--
Anthony Fok Tung-Ling Civil and Environmental Engineering
foka@ualberta.ca, foka@debian.org University of Alberta, Canada
Come visit Our Lady of Victory Camp -- http://www.olvc.ab.ca/
Reply to: