a funny bug?
Guess it will have something related to scwm. ;)
I'm too sleepy right now, and will have an important
job hunting meeting tomorrow. I'll be back and give
more precise report later.
Debian Potato.
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-================-================-================================================
ii libc6 2.1.2-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone dat
ii locales 2.1.2-11.0.1 GNU C Library: National Language (locale) data [
ii i18ndata 2.1.2-11 GNU C Library: National Language (locale) data [
ii xlib6g 3.3.5-2 shared libraries required by X clients
Scwm is the nearest CVS version built at home. maybe 3 or 4 days back.
Guile is from CVS too. 1 or 2 weeks back?
the problem is:
whenever i do: (I added an alias for GB2312 for /usr/lib/X11/locales/locale.alias
by hand on Debian.)
$ LANG=zh_CN.GB2312 gedit
and open a file full of chinese characters coded in GB2312. The scwm manager
_restarts_ and after a while after it's runing ok, all the rxvt and xemacs
windows got one line _shorter_.
and to the gedit side, if i set LANG=zh_CN.GB2312, then nothing will shown
in gedit window. if i set LANG=C, then chinese characters are shown in
(wrong) some iso-fonts for single byte character sets. I've also tried
gnp (gnotepad+), and since i'd tried for quite sometimes, my crxvt-gb
terminal got only 32 lines tall from 40 lines tall originally at last. ;)
.
i'm frankly not too good at find the clue in such a situation. ;)
so, please. ;) I think it will be hard for you too, but if you could
give me any suggestions or hints or whatever, I may try my best to
try to fix, or at least give out a trace or what. ;)
Best regards,
And prepare for the up-coming China New Year! ;)
--
zhaoway -=- zw * zhaoway.com -=- http://www.zhaoway.com/ -=- blue ribbon
GnuPG 1024D/7C0441F2 BF4F B39D A53E A9BB 1057 2364 652C 1BA6 7C04 41F2
Reply to: