Re: Re[2]: An article about BluePoint Linux

To: Adoal Xu <adoal@iname.com>
Cc: debian-simplified-chinese@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re[2]: An article about BluePoint Linux
From: informer@mylinux.cgu.edu.tw
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 01:30:33 +0800 (CST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.10.10001050124320.2441-100000@mylinux.cgu.edu.tw>
In-reply-to: <003d01bf4ea2$f2bc7a10$108920d2@LUNARIS>

> kernel里的table好象只是给vfat/fat32/ntfs/juliet用的，用户态程序
> 无法访问吧？
> 我看干脆做一个/dev/i18n，下面放上
> /dev/i18n/ctype、/dev/i18n/collation之类的，
> 然后重写libc和应用程序的相关部分，让它们
> 都用这个dev。具体每个locale的东西可以做成
> module由用户决定载入就是了。

That is an interesting suggestion. 
But should we give up the standard gconv/iconv interface ?

Since glibc is Linux & Hurd specific now, maybe it is a good idea :-Q

--
Pofeng "informer" Lee, 琭網, mailto:pofeng@linux.org.NOSPAM.tw
TEL: 03-3286030 ext 6582 (20:00-23:00) Room: 394  Pager: 3835
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Re[4]: [FYI] 主　　题∶转贴: 答Bluepoint Devin兄
Next by Date: Re: concensus on removing TeX and Emacs from standard
Previous by thread: Re: Re[2]: [FYI] ¥D¡@¡@ÃD¡GÂà¶K: µªBluepoint Devin¥S
Next by thread: Re: Re[2]: An article about BluePoint Linux
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread