Re: xcin input method
Hi,
I am now trying to get pinyin input method going with the Big5
locale. This is what I did:
[22:51|pts/0]s2193893@virge % export LANG=zh_TW.Big5
[22:51|pts/0]s2193893@virge % xcin &
[1] 2425
[22:51|pts/0]s2193893@virge % XCIN (ÖÐÎÄ XIM server) °æ±¾ xcin 2.5.1-3¡£
(Ä£×é°æ±¾: 19990710, syscin °æ±¾: 19990521)
(ʹÓà "-h" Ñ¡ÏîÏÔʾÏßÉÏ˵Ã÷)
xcin: ´íÎó: rcfile: pinyin: SETKEY: ÎÞЧµÄ±äÊýÖµ¡£
[1] + exit 255 xcin
In my ~/.xcin/xcinrc file, I changed the following lines:
(CINPUT (cj simplex phone cantonese bimsphone array30 pinyin zh_hex))
and added:
(define pinyin
'((SETKEY 9)
(AUTO_COMPOSE YES)
(AUTO_UPCHAR YES)
(AUTO_FULLUP NO)
(SPACE_AUTOUP NO)
(SELKEY_SHIFT NO)
(SPACE_IGNORE NO)
(SPACE_RESET YES)
(AUTO_RESET NO)
(END_KEY NO)
(WILD_ENABLE YES)
(AUTO_SELECT NO)
(SINMD_IN_LINE1 YES)
(BEEP_WRONG YES)
(BEEP_DUPCHAR YES)))
Thanks.
Shao.
thhsieh@linux.org.tw [thhsieh@linux.org.tw] wrote:
> http://xcin.linux.org.tw/xcin-2.5/2.5.1/UserGuide.html
> http://xcin.linux.org.tw/xcin-2.5/2.5.1/FAQ.html: QC.5
>
> And, currently the xcin stable version is 2.5.1-4. The only difference
> between it and 2.5.1-3 is the updation of FAQ doc, and a small fix in
> makefile. It is basically the same as 2.5.1-3.
>
>
> T.H.Hsieh
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-chinese-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
--
____________________________________________________________________________
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1 ___ _ _____
Department of Communications / __| |_ __ _ ___ |_ / |_ __ _ _ _ __ _
University of New South Wales \__ \ ' \/ _` / _ \ / /| ' \/ _` | ' \/ _` |
Sydney, Australia |___/_||_\__,_\___/ /___|_||_\__,_|_||_\__, |
Email: shao@cia.com.au |___/
_____________________________________________________________________________
--
[ This mail was originally sent to debian-chinese@lists.debian.org ]
[ and was forwarded to this list automatically. Big5 characters are ]
[ also converted to GB at the same time, Please note that there may ]
[ be errors during the conversion as this is not done by a human! ]
Reply to: