Re: annoying thing xmlcatalogs
- To: Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo@debian.org>
- Cc: Mark Johnson <mark@dulug.duke.edu>, Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@debian.org>, debian-sgml@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: annoying thing xmlcatalogs
- From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshored.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:38:46 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] oa3calzya1.fsf@sopa.onshored.com>
- In-reply-to: <20040112022620.GA30078@sbcglobal.net> (Ardo van Rangelrooij's message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:26:20 -0600")
- References: <20031217125112.GB10216@sbcglobal.net> <oay8tb9v33.fsf@sopa.onshored.com> <20031217223846.GC10216@sbcglobal.net> <oan08vpyot.fsf@sopa.onshored.com> <20040110225718.GC2888@sbcglobal.net> <16384.42497.759576.762070@mcgarrett.adsl.duke.edu> <oaisjjdxee.fsf_-_@sopa.onshored.com> <20040112015156.GP2888@sbcglobal.net> <16386.1056.548323.312854@mcgarrett.adsl.duke.edu> <20040112022620.GA30078@sbcglobal.net>
Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo@debian.org> writes:
> Mark Johnson (mark@dulug.duke.edu) wrote:
>> Hmm... interesting solution. Hadn't thought of new type of entry.
>>
>> My initial thinking was that if a 'package' entry was missing,
>> dh_installcatalogs would simply generate a package catalog based on
>> the info in the 'root' + 'local' entries.
I don't want to get into the idea of the dh_installcatalogs script
being smart enough to know whether a root entry is missing a package
entry (or vice versa).
Regarding the idea of a new 'single' command as outlined by Ardo, I
like the idea and I'll make it so. Can we think of a better name for
it, though? I kinda like 'root-and-package' as a command. It's
pretty direct in its meaning, even if it is rather long.
--
...Adam Di Carlo...<adam@onshored.com>.......<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
Reply to: