Re: annoying thing xmlcatalogs
> >> My initial thinking was that if a 'package' entry was missing,
> >> dh_installcatalogs would simply generate a package catalog based on
> >> the info in the 'root' + 'local' entries.
>
> I don't want to get into the idea of the dh_installcatalogs script
> being smart enough to know whether a root entry is missing a package
> entry (or vice versa).
I wasn't sure how hard that would be to implement. (I don't know
perl.) Kill that idea, then.
>
> Regarding the idea of a new 'single' command as outlined by Ardo, I
> like the idea and I'll make it so. Can we think of a better name for
> it, though? I kinda like 'root-and-package' as a command.
Yeah, I was thinking along these lines. Kind of the opposite of
single, actually. Something that conveys the meaning 'both'.
I like root-and-package, too. Unambiguous.
Mark
--
_____________________________________
Mark Johnson <mark@dulug.duke.edu>
Debian XML/SGML <mrj@debian.org>
Home Page: <http://dulug.duke.edu/~mark/>
GPG fp: DBEA FA3C C46A 70B5 F120 568B 89D5 4F61 C07D E242
Reply to: