Re: xml catalog status

To: debian-sgml@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: xml catalog status
From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 21:10:24 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030520021024.GP16864@sbcglobal.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-sgml@lists.debian.org
Reply-to: Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1053394500.5859.59.camel@gregdell>
References: <[🔎] 20030519101548.GA2164@enigma.daemon.sh> <[🔎] 20030519234844.GM16864@sbcglobal.net> <[🔎] 1053394500.5859.59.camel@gregdell>

Gregory Leblanc (gleblanc@linuxweasel.com) wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-05-19 at 16:48, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> [snip]
> > 
> > I'm also waiting for a more definitive version of the XML/SGML policy,
> > since that's what xml-core is implementing.
> 
> Which XML/SGML policy?  LSB?

Debian.  See an earlier message from Mark Johnson.  But Mark is trying
to get the LSB XML/SGML policy back to live.

Thanks,
Ardo
-- 
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: ardo@debian.org
home page:  http://people.debian.org/~ardo
GnuPG fp:   3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73  7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9

Reply to:

References:
- xml catalog status
  - From: Sebastian Henschel <shensche@kodeaffe.de>
- Re: xml catalog status
  - From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <ardo@debian.org>
- Re: xml catalog status
  - From: Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc@linuxweasel.com>

Prev by Date: Re: xml catalog status
Next by Date: Re: xml catalog status
Previous by thread: Re: xml catalog status
Next by thread: Re: xml catalog status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread